Measuring the right things

Any science student has, at some point, sat through a lecture on research methods which covers reliability and validity as factors which must be taken into account.  They can be handily summarised as: ‘If I, or someone else, repeat this experiment, will it give the same sort of result?’, and ‘Is my experiment actually measuring what I think it’s measuring?’.  Obviously a well-designed experiment will fulfill both these conditions.  Usually a series of funny little examples are presented, in the hope they’ll stick in your memory and help you distinguish between the two.  Despite this, I’d mostly forgotten about such things, until I saw the cartoon below – a particularly good example of an experiment high in reliability that isn’t measuring what it’s meant to be measuring – and the sort of result that neuroscientists really don’t want to see!




(source:)                                                                                                          Used under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.

If you’d like to find out more information about fMRI, has a very good summary here.


New thoughts on animal thinking

CBR member, neuropsychologist, and author Professor Michael Corballis features in the news section of the latest Science Magazine, commenting on a recent study which builds on his groundbreaking ‘Mental Time Travel’ work.

‘Mental Time Travel’ is the phrase coined by Professor Corballis and his colleague Thomas Suddendorf in a 2007 paper, which explored humans’ ability to utilise and recombine existing memories in novel ways in order to imagine an effectively infite number of possible future scenarios.

At the time, the pair thought that this was an ability only humans posessed, but further research by others is causing Professor Corballis to reassess this view, which could lead to a major shift in the ways we think of animal consciousness.

Read the Science article here: